/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14065131

37KiB, 650x378, index.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 13:24:44 2022 No.14065131 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14065204 >>14065494 >>14066446 >>14066451 >>14067280 >>14067298 >>14067314

Redpill me on Theranos, was it fake or misunderstood tech in development ?
I am kinda on the border of believing it was all fraud because in the end the tech was stopped more by government bans than anything else..

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 13:51:51 No.14065204 Report

Quoted By: >>14066471 >>14067314

>>14065131
It was all a fraud. There was no innovative technology, all they had was the unrealistic vision of the final product. Elizabeth fucked up big time, but she was ultimately just a victim of her own delusions. The true villain of the story is that filthy pajeet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 15:24:47 No.14065494 Report

Quoted By: >>14065525

>>14065131
i wanna face fuck elizabeth holmes

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Elizabeth_Holmes_2014_cropped.jpg, 123KiB, 493x777

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 15:33:55 No.14065525 Report

Quoted By:

>>14065494
that psychopathic eyes makes her even hotter

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 15:35:23 No.14065534 Report

Quoted By:

very cringy how the people who supported that con artist are now pretending theyre smart by calling her out for being a sociopath after it was revealed

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 20:12:59 No.14066395 Report

Quoted By: >>14067314

Elizabeth had a weird Steve Jobs obsession. She wanted to be like him in every way. She wanted to be a silicon valley icon and wanted to be known as someone who "changed the world."

That disgusting poojeet phone scammer saw an ambitious, photogenic and naive young girl and saw an opportunity for a con. He knew the the media would give significant play to any young female entrepreneur. And her big blue eyes could be used to manipulate lonely old jewish investors into funneling money into whatever she proposed. The rest is history.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 20:29:49 No.14066446 Report

Quoted By:

>>14065131
I believe it was fraud all along because of the secrecy of the project. Because "allow a liar to speak long enough and he will eventually expose himself" and here she didn't tell people what exactly she did and why it was gonna work.
But then part of me thinks that elites may not want blood sampling made by drops, because they still litres of baby blood for rejuvenations.
And if the second thing is true (independent from ther-anus case) then we must invent some artificial blood better than natural or even better techniques of rejuvenation, so that our Leaders (those who can fill you with lead) don't have to treat us that horribly when they don't need slaves when they can print or grow everything they want for themselves.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 20:31:40 No.14066451 Report

Quoted By:

>>14065131
>Redpill me on Theranos
Arizona cute girl brain imposter was Helene's pet project about how, "Femism, yes huh!," isn't stupid and deluded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 20:40:02 No.14066471 Report

Quoted By: >>14066480

>>14065204
>victim
With multi million dollar vank account

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screen Shot 2022-01-06 at 3.43.0 (...).png, 50KiB, 689x185

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 20:43:40 No.14066480 Report

Quoted By:

>>14066471

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 06 Jan 2022 23:54:29 No.14067280 Report

Quoted By:

>>14065131
that's actually pretty standard for a vc firm. why does she get the bad rap?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:00:07 No.14067298 Report

Quoted By: >>14067314

>>14065131
She lied to her investors. It doesn't matter if she lied to customers, as long as customer gets what they paid for. A blood test (even if manually done) is a non issue for general public.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:06:36 No.14067314 Report

Quoted By: >>14067323

>>14065131
>Redpill me on Theranos, was it fake or misunderstood tech in development ?
>>14065204
>It was all a fraud. There was no innovative technology, all they had was the unrealistic vision of the final product. Elizabeth fucked up big time, but she was ultimately just a victim of her own delusions.
>>14066395
>She wanted to be a silicon valley icon and wanted to be known as someone who "changed the world."
>>14067298
>She lied to her investors.

Making big promises on hopeful future innovation that is very unlikely to materialize is basically how all tech startups work. In that regard Elizabeth Holmes isn't any different from any other tech startup founder.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:09:14 No.14067323 Report

Quoted By: >>14067353 >>14067387

>>14067314
>Making big promises
No. There's big promise and there's lying.

All promising CEOs make big promises. But only few straight up lie to investors by claiming they have a working thing when they don't. She claimed to have a working device that automates blood testing. She didn't. She wasn't "promising" to have it in a year or so, she claimed to have it right now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:21:34 No.14067353 Report

Quoted By:

>>14067323
ah ok thanks I wasn't paying attention that closely

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:31:13 No.14067387 Report

Quoted By: >>14067397

>>14067323
Didn't she do a phony demo to impress investors

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 07 Jan 2022 00:34:02 No.14067397 Report

Quoted By:

>>14067387
No, she sold the device to walgreens/cvs/investors by claiming to have a working product when she didn't.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches