>>14055922Women actually don't understand men naturally. For example, my ex-girlfriend thought that nipples were an erogenous zone for men until I slapped her hand away and told her to stop touching them. She also wanted to stick her tongue in my urethra until I told her not to fucking do that.
Feminists also don't understand the male sex drive--they believe that the allure of sex for men is "power" (rather than lust, driven by male hormones), which is a clear projection of their own self-conscious desires. Women also struggle to understand men's motivations regarding anything beyond sex, which is why feminists tend to view the world purely through its relationship to sex (particularly rape, which seems to be the greatest female obsession of all) and their bodies, whereas men have a multidimensional world views in which objects and abstract ideas play important roles, with sex being only a single component.
Anyway, the reason it seems like women have men "figured out" is that male sexual desire is straightforward and easy to understand (based mainly on visual cues), therefore there's not much to figure out. Women, on the other hand, are much more selective in choosing sexual partners and their responses when directly asked what they are attracted to are all over the fucking map (though their behavior is relatively consistent regardless), which is why they have a reputation for being difficult to understand.
They're really not that difficult to understand once you understand them though; they're basically shitty robots programmed with the following algorithm:
Class Female:
def __init__(self):
self.is_attracted = false
self.fake_attraction = false
def is_attracted_to(self, man):
if man.is_physically_attractive:
if not man.appears_in_love_with(self) or not man.available:
self.is_attracted = true
else:
self.is_attracted = false
if man.is_rich or man.is_useful:
self.fake_attraction = true
