/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14047295

68KiB, 1030x569, terrascope.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 15:08:29 2022 No.14047295 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14047305 >>14048084 >>14050411 >>14051053

What does /sci/ think of this?
https://youtu.be/jgOTZe07eHA

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 15:11:16 No.14047305 Report

Quoted By: >>14047327 >>14047467

>>14047295
Don't you think if it worked like that nasa wouldn't have wasted 50 billion dollars on some 100 foot piece of space trash? Coming man think logically this is a science board

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 15:19:38 No.14047327 Report

Quoted By:

>>14047305
This is a new idea, NASA didn't test it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 15:21:47 No.14047342 Report

Quoted By:

Just use the sun instead its vastly better

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 15:53:03 No.14047467 Report

Quoted By: >>14047951

>>14047305
You mean the same Nasa which had two shuttle disasters? That Nasa? The same Nasa which now puts diversity ahead of talent and so sends up mentally unstable women astronauts onto space stations? That Nasa? Maybe you are talking about a different Nasa...

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 18:07:28 No.14047938 Report

Quoted By: >>14050872 >>14051328

Why did NASA publish images taken from the Sofia plane telescope as coming from Hubble?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 18:12:20 No.14047951 Report

Quoted By: >>14048932 >>14048962

>>14047467
I was wondering why people here want JWST to fail so bad.
Everything comes down to politics I guess.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO b118ac7f62745ec615cc648932c61e9a.jpg, 67KiB, 960x720

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 18:57:18 No.14048084 Report

Quoted By:

>>14047295
>Calibrating void lenses

going to be a major part of warp physics. Planetary scanning, keeping observable treasure chest orbits that one wants to keep an eye on, great conspiracy black sun memetic potential.

This could also be applied with bose-einstein condensates to drastically increase the permittivity and permeability of a region above a desired focal point.

Its one of those, if not highly cited than posthumously at some point so

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 22:31:22 No.14048932 Report

Quoted By:

>>14047951
>I was wondering why people here want JWST to fail so bad.
It's literally just butthurt whitebois.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO quote-politics-is-more-difficult (...).jpg, 43KiB, 850x400

Anonymous Sun 02 Jan 2022 22:38:17 No.14048962 Report

Quoted By: >>14050597

>>14047951
>Everything comes down to politics I guess.
sure does make politics seem a hell of a lot more important that science
thats why /pol/ has so much higher iq than /sci/
even einstein agrees that /pol/ requires higher iq than /sci/ and that science is a midwit pursuit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 05:06:21 No.14050332 Report

Quoted By:

He seems pretty modest. The first thing I thought of was the atmosphere has turbulence and that could effect it or some shut but he seems to bring it up. Not much to say other then some guys need to do the math and run simulation to see if it's possible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 05:34:12 No.14050411 Report

Quoted By: >>14050877

>>14047295
IMO the idea using the sun's gravity as a lens is probably more likely to be reliable, if we had a good way to get something out that far fast enough.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO fk scott adams.jpg, 15KiB, 195x438

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 06:49:40 No.14050597 Report

Quoted By:

>>14048962
>even einstein agrees that /pol/ requires higher iq than /sci/ and that science is a midwit pursuit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 08:48:33 No.14050872 Report

Quoted By: >>14050918

>>14047938
Why are you making shit up?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 08:50:50 No.14050877 Report

Quoted By:

>>14050411
>using the sun's gravity as a lens
If only the Sun was a 1000 more massive, you'd be on to something

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 09:18:33 No.14050918 Report

Quoted By: >>14050922 >>14051328

>>14050872
They did.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 09:19:44 No.14050922 Report

Quoted By: >>14050929

>>14050918
post sauce retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 09:23:26 No.14050929 Report

Quoted By: >>14051037 >>14051328

>>14050922
That would take too much effort to find again.
Which is weak argumentation but you could just take it as one possible scenario.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 10:14:11 No.14051037 Report

Quoted By: >>14051044

>>14050929
>take it as one possible scenario
Yeah, except it's not possible

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 10:17:12 No.14051044 Report

Quoted By: >>14051057 >>14051280

>>14051037
Or so you would think.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 10:19:00 No.14051053 Report

Quoted By:

>>14047295
It's a waste of time, you can't aim it where you want.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 10:21:00 No.14051057 Report

Quoted By: >>14051280

>>14051044
post sauce retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 11:57:12 No.14051280 Report

Quoted By: >>14051286

>>14051044
Sure you can pass off any pic as being from Hubble. But it would take less than an hour before some pro or amateur astronomer would blow you out on twitter

>>14051057
>post sauce retard
There is none. He made it up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 12:00:21 No.14051286 Report

Quoted By: >>14051293 >>14051318

>>14051280
No I didn't, it was in one of those long compilation videos I watched a while back, I don't know which one or where it was which presents a barrier unless I get lucky and stumble upon it again.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 12:03:18 No.14051293 Report

Quoted By:

>>14051286
Lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 12:15:22 No.14051318 Report

Quoted By:

>>14051286
More likely: some conspiritard video on YT claimed it was the case, of course also without providing any evidence.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 12:20:49 No.14051328 Report

Quoted By: >>14051351

>>14047938
>>14050918
>>14050929
You're spouting conspiracy bullshit. Shit that's even too retarded for /x/.
SOFIA didn't see first light until 2010. So where did 2 decades of Hubble images come from?
This retarded conspiracy is based on two idiotic points. They have the same effective mirror diameter and they happened to be observing the same target on once. They were observing the same target because there was a rare supernova in a nearby galaxy, it's not illegal. They work in different regions of the spectrum. SOFIA's image quality is orders of magnitude worse than Hubble. You'd literally have to be missing half a brain to find this convincing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 03 Jan 2022 12:31:28 No.14051351 Report

Quoted By:

>>14051328
Makes sense.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches