>>14036568Okay, I see that the program is meant to be a kind of pseudocode rather than an actual program.
Note that multiple integers will lead to the same real number, but we can work around this by skipping nonzero multiples of ten or whatever.
I think the immediate objection you'll face is that a real number such as 0.333... will never be generated. Ultimately it goes back to what those who accept Cantor's diagonalization argument say in response to some attempted integer analogues: "..." is invalid when used with an integer.
