>>14034708Well I was hoping we wouldn't have to go down this road, hoping you would relinquish the point.
But what you are engaging in is obscurantism, which is very dishonest and unscientific. I didn't want to embarrass you in front of your colleagues.
Consider the story known as Loki's Wager
>Loki bet his head with a dwarf>loses and dwarf comes to collect>Loki is compliant but insists no part of his neck be taken>claims that there is no objective way to measure where the neck ends and head begins>they keep going in circles until the dwarf gives up and sews Loki's mouth shutThe moral of the story is that terms which are intuitively understood don't need to be precisely defined in order to discuss or act upon them.
