>>14032924>>14032932>>14032934>>14034620OP's question presupposes that there is such a thing in the first place. Not to say that there isn't, but that the virus itself poses anything more than a baseline threat that's been inflated to plaguelike proportions by propaganda. For reference the Black Death killed hundreds of millions of people, including about a third to half of the population of Europe at the time, the coronavirus hasn't killed more than a few million when there's several billion inhabiting the planet, not more than a tenth of a percent.
>inb4 because of the "precautions"No. The precautions were the goal of the pandemic in the first place. Many, many small businesses have perished as a result of this. Big Tech and Big Pharma have only grown more powerful, and they're fooling and coercing just enough people to get away with it. Plainly put, it's an act of war, DOSing people, mostly on an economic front, but also a psychological one as people are slowly going insane being locked in their houses all day and all night and lied to. There's always going to be an explanation if the numbers are high, if they're low, if it's bad one place but not another, they're going to be flimsy if not for the fact that the "truth" is as such by force. To say that if you don't think the coronavirus needs such an aggressive response then "something must be wrong with you" and they'll set out to "fix it" with medications in case the crushing force of threats or lies or general public hysteria or yanking your means of putting food on the table doesn't do it already.