>>14032749That's retarded. We're not random searching through 10^285 states, there's many that can work. Furthermore, it's not randomly sifting, some environments will be closest to life and have the best conditions.
>naively modeledIt admits that it's an idiotic strawman right there in black and white. As if we know what the oceans were doing down to a nanomolecular level billions of years ago. Nobody is certain of anything to 10^20 years, let alone 10^200 universe-lengths.
