>>14032597>except for the litteral picture,Oh "the picture"(digital rendition). The one of the shadow or the polarized light source with its own special name?
>countless observations of their influence and all maths pointing to their existancewhat is the math behind a shadow and why does measuring them somehow prove they exist?
>what the fuck does that mean?You're a polarized retard so you tell me.
>there have been many tests, we know theres something but we are yet to explainWell normally explanations come after experiments so what the fuck have they tested?
>speak for yourselfIt's a science board and people only approve accurate descriptions here
>yes that is what you do with incredible phenomena you want to learn more aboutYes. Now how many more names will you come up for ONE thing?
what does that mean?
Exactly what I said which is why I chose the words. It has no properties. So obviously I can't test it. So I shouldn't be assuming anything about it.
>>14033091Wow, all that and no fucking test to show for it. Maybe they'll get a clue once they figure out none of their precise equipment works without fucking magnets. How do they work? Why don't they care how they work?
>>14032758>EU is as bad as the symbology/numerology retards, with (it seems) big overlap with those groups.And when did I mention "EU"?
>I think you're looking for attention.Boy did I come to the absolutely wrong place to do that.
>I wonder how many electric universe proponents would commit suicide if people started ignoring them.No one will leave them alone because the people who make fun of them are too well trained in telling others what to believe.
