>>14025423The complex portion isn't measurable or applicable to reality or part of the frequency are you trying to dispute that somehow.
Do you even understand that it only arises because mathematically you have to simultaneously use inversion for per second along with symmetry due to angular sine representation that sets up the situation where you are square rooting negatives in the math, but the real actual measurable frequency is never directly impacted by the imaginary component, its just kind of what is left over when you take the math to its limits of calculation with a value or its multiple that can only be represented in the orthogonal imaginary domain?
