No.14023333 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Does it hold any significance other than being pseudoscience? Or the argument of irreducible complexity as a whole.
I can't find proper explanations of how evolution would handle developing irreducibly complex things such as biological motors and wings and would like to hear about it.
I can however certainly see the argument for an eye developing through evolution, a mutation for a photon wave sensor happens where a bacteria can differentiate between light and dark and as time goes on the sensor grows more complex. But I don't see why the parts for a motor would slowly come together evolutionary.