/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #14019412

7KiB, 256x197, 1570807848150.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 17:08:51 2021 No.14019412 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>14019439

Brainlet here.
Could someone explain the solution to this problem and why people argue so much about it?
>>>/v/582892367

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 2021 17:13:23 No.14019439 Report

Quoted By: >>14019450 >>14020167

>>14019412
The answer is literally given in the thread. A thread died for your bullshit /v/ faggotry. Don't ever come back to this board ever again.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1570807848150.jpg, 21KiB, 480x436

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 2021 17:15:54 No.14019450 Report

Quoted By:

>>14019439
Ok. Sorry

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 2021 19:52:15 No.14020154 Report

Quoted By: >>14020164

The question asks how to minimize area, which is nonsensical. It then becomes a question of whether 0 is the smallest area, or if you can go negative by introducing complex and/or negative side lengths (that do not exist in real life)

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 2021 19:53:41 No.14020164 Report

Quoted By:

>>14020154
I'd say the solution is 15cm minus planck length & planck length for an area of [very fucking small]

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 27 Dec 2021 19:54:36 No.14020167 Report

Quoted By:

>>14019439
the only difference between this thread and a generic math problem thread is that he posted frogs. shut up faggot.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches