>>14014754No, and it doesn't claim to.
Wikipedia outright advertises that it can be edited by anyone albeit with a small team of reviewers who check for ridiculousness like the article for Space just being a sentence "space isn't real".
If you want to find out what kind of bias, if any, they have just read the first sentence of von Braun. It says he was an aerospace engineer and that's it. It doesn't even mention nazis until the second paragraph and even then just to point out exactly what country he worked for--it doesn't even claim that he *was* a nazi, only that he worked under the regime at the time. Even the section specifically about the topic doesn't even label him a nazi, it merely says "involvement with the Nazi regime". It literally could not be a "nicer" article about the subject.
The one with the agenda is you, because you look for nonsense such as the picture you posted and then wave that around like it's the front page of Wikipedia.
But, because you're baiting but also retarded I will point it out again for others, including yourself.
No, wikipedia does not have any scientific merit, it only summarizes the first and second hand sources which are linked which do have scientific merit. If you read any paragraph in wikipedia and take that as truth without going to the source, you are beyond salvation.
