>>14007739>In reality it's the oil companies response to an anti-oil campaign memed by some non scientific study that linked fossil fuel emissions and CO2 to a buzzword.Well, apparently even ExxonMobil themselves knew about the link between CO2 and temperatures since the late 70's if you believe
>>14005774. I myself posted this one:
>>14005585, so as you can see I'm very much aware of how temperatures have risen over the years. It has gotten so bad that it's unbearable without AC during summer. I wasn't always convinced CO2 was the cause since it's such weak greenhouse gas, but I guess I do now.
>Who else do you think actually has the initial start up money to invest in such lunacy?I guess Soviet Russia would have had the resources to prop up a leftist or green movement with goals like that in the western world to cripple them. They certainly had the know-how to set that up and make those groups believe what they wanted them to believe, like nuclear = bad.
>what do you think those emission tests are for?What the green fags thin they're for. But pointless with electric cars going mainstream now.
>Also to keep you buying more vehicles more oftenIt might actually make more sense to do the opposite and drive a car from the 80's... That's not tooo old, but counts as oldtimer. No tax.
>bureaucracy tends to never like to change things once they become reality so now we have tons of radioactive waste that we're not allowed to extract the rest of the energy from.Why would it be hard to fill up some molten salt reactors with old waste? Other than physically getting to it wherever it's stored. Recycling that dangerous, glowing, radioactive stuff should make anyone in charge of dealing with storing that very happy.
>It's more of a psychosis than anything.Yes, a kind of delusion. Memetic warfare was what I was thinking of. It's actually a thing, too I noticed recently. Funny how memes are everywhere now.
