>>14002145> then why isn't there a mass equivalent to I=dQ/dtthere is
>What would be the physical meaning of dm/dt?(mass) flow rate, or mass flux; it's called many things.
> And what would we need to integrate to get mass?You integrate flowrate over time to get a change in mass. for example, you know the flowrate of all the river dumping into a reservoir, and you know the rate leaving the dam. with mass conservation, you can work out the amount of water in the reservoir.
charge =>mass/volume (when incompressible)
currrent => flowrate
voltage => potential energy/head
resistance => head loss
capacitance => water storage in reservoirs
inductance => mechanical inertia
I fucking love the hydraulic analogy bros