>>13998252can a real scientist interpret this for me?
They had groups with three different proxies for iq (Analogies test, a Synonyms Vocabulary teest, and SAT scores)
which is okay [really more a test of economic power of your parents but whatever]
the question is why did they need to use 3 different definitions of conservatism for the different groups? Smacks of, what do you cool scientists call it, p-hacking, to me?
~
~
btw I already consider this study useless because it is using people who took the English as a second language test for grad school admission into the u,s, as a major n base. which of course you are going to catch more liberal view points from people already willing to immigrant, while excluding the smart conservatives that stayed home
this is the kind of bullshit I always find when I ever try to find good data on this.
