IIT we go section by section through the Renz-law motion for primary injunction and review in particular the scientific merit of the claims being made.
https://renz-law.com/wp-content/uploads/M-for-PI-file-stamped.pdf?fbclid=IwAR13q_PBDCg7jDIHqmsSH0cXs9POXWhJnM6MBZQ-oKgP96M9NXO57_LKMNQ
Larping within this thread is allowed and statement of scientific fact is encouraged.
"Debunking" based on googling is heavily discouraged, we are capable of reaching consensus without relying on Snopes or other to do the "fact checking"
Specifically within the doccument section title SUMMARY OF FACT Subsection A
The Unlawful Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations
(1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency
(2) § 360bbb–3(c)(1): There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease
or Condition
(3) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(A): The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent
SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19
(4) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(B): The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines
Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits
(5) § 360bbb–3(c)(3): There Are Adequate, Approved and Available
Alternatives to the Vaccines
(6) § 360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(i) and (ii): Healthcare Professionals and Vaccine
Candidates are Not Adequately Informed
(7) § 360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(iii): Monitoring and Reporting of Adverse Events
First and foremost I propose we begin on (1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency
SARSCoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons
under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately
inflated. On March 24, 2020, DHHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others
responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations —
exclusively for COVID-19. The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate.
https://renz-law.com/wp-content/uploads/M-for-PI-file-stamped.pdf?fbclid=IwAR13q_PBDCg7jDIHqmsSH0cXs9POXWhJnM6MBZQ-oKgP96M9NXO57_LKMNQ
Larping within this thread is allowed and statement of scientific fact is encouraged.
"Debunking" based on googling is heavily discouraged, we are capable of reaching consensus without relying on Snopes or other to do the "fact checking"
Specifically within the doccument section title SUMMARY OF FACT Subsection A
The Unlawful Vaccine Emergency Use Authorizations
(1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency
(2) § 360bbb–3(c)(1): There is in Fact no Serious or Life-Threatening Disease
or Condition
(3) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(A): The Vaccines Do Not Diagnose, Treat or Prevent
SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19
(4) § 360bbb–3(c)(2)(B): The Known and Potential Risks of the Vaccines
Outweigh their Known and Potential Benefits
(5) § 360bbb–3(c)(3): There Are Adequate, Approved and Available
Alternatives to the Vaccines
(6) § 360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(i) and (ii): Healthcare Professionals and Vaccine
Candidates are Not Adequately Informed
(7) § 360bbb–3(e)(1)(A)(iii): Monitoring and Reporting of Adverse Events
First and foremost I propose we begin on (1) 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb–3(b)(1)(C): There is No Emergency
SARSCoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons
under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately
inflated. On March 24, 2020, DHHS changed the rules applicable to coroners and others
responsible for producing death certificates and making “cause of death” determinations —
exclusively for COVID-19. The rule change states: “COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate.
