>>13984863t. far-left authoritarian anti-science SJW
Wikipedia sucks ass, even for scientific information, especially in the biomdeical sciences. Some of their pages on COVID literally used to describe the lab-leak hypothesis as a "far-right conspiracy theory", and I wouldn't be surprised if some of the pages making such claims still haven't been updates.
I'm doing a masters degree in biology, so I'm by no means an expert, but I guarantee I know more about the subject than most Wikipedia contributors or anons on this website, and the majority of working biologists I know have entertained the lab leak hypothesis as a serious possibility since day 1. Are they convinced? No, but it's certainly not a "far-right conspiracy theory". It's probably correct, but even if the Lab Leak hypothesis is false, it still wouldn't be a "far-right conspiracy theory", it would simply be a scientific hypothesis that has been falsified. The very fact that the lab leak hypothesis was presented as a "conspiracy theory" by the media and far-left SJWs just shows how politicized our political climate has become, and that far-left authoritarians are just as "anti-science" as the far-right.
That is just one example of how wikipedia is horseshit when it comes to biology, and that specific instance is largely due to politicization. I could give you probably a dozen other examples too, some political, some having nothing to do with politics. In particular, I have seen a lot of horseshit on wikipedia when it comes to anything neuroscience/cognitive science related, and anything evolution/game theory related. The entire website is like 30 years behind modern evolutionary biology. Most of their articles barely discuss the Extended Modern Synthesis, EvoDevo biology, or epigenetics.
