>>13980753first of all, you used “empirically” where it would’ve been more appropriate to use “coincidentally”.
secondly, because The Secret is mainly concerned with the supposed effects of things like thought, feeling, emotion i.e. all things which cannot be measured, it is necessarily placed outside the realm of science. indeed the thesis of The Secret, which is basically
>believing something is true eventually makes it truecouldn’t be more diametrically opposed to the scientific method, which is basically
>believe something is false until sufficient evidence rules out alternativestl;dr OP is a fag
