>>13976544>and network sciencethat's not a science
>ergodic theorythat's a field that's only pertinent to a very small part of modern physics. you could comfortably ignore it and not lose much
>complex systemsthis isn't really a field of science and they don't really produce much reproducible work.
Everything you picked has a statistical or CS-adjacent flavor because you're a stupid faggot with an inferiority complex.
