/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13975832

32KiB, 474x316, 3BF7D316-2AA9-4F14-8947-CA991311843A.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Big Bang cosmology is a sham

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 00:02:15 2021 No.13975832 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13975874 >>13977070

The universe is infinite in both time and scope. It has no beginning and no end.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 00:02:45 No.13975837 Report

Quoted By: >>13977067

Define universe

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 00:03:25 No.13975842 Report

Quoted By:

>It has no beginning and no end.
that doesn't contradict modern cosmology

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 00:09:50 No.13975874 Report

Quoted By: >>13975929 >>13976212

>>13975832
The Big Bang is not a beginning, cosmic inflation preceded it. The inflation destroyed the information that preceded it, so that's why it seems like a "beginning."

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 00:23:09 No.13975929 Report

Quoted By: >>13976205

>>13975874
The inflation is “the miracle.” It’s only an assumption based on the current condition of the universe, but it is completely wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 01:29:25 No.13976205 Report

Quoted By: >>13976218

>>13975929
Prove it, steady state breath.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 01:32:20 No.13976212 Report

Quoted By:

>>13975874
>The inflation destroyed the information that preceded it, so that's why it seems like a "beginning."
LOL. Imagine believing this is science.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 01:35:06 No.13976218 Report

Quoted By: >>13977005

>>13976205
But inflationary cosmologists are the ones proposing the miracle, therefore the burden of proof falls in them. I could just as easily claim a wizard did it.

Dark matter? Dark energy? Cosmological constant? Or was it a wizard?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 05:38:59 No.13977005 Report

Quoted By:

>>13976218
>Or was it a wizard?
Empirical possibility.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 05:55:56 No.13977067 Report

Quoted By:

>>13975837
Is there another definition apart from "everything that exists"? That's what I've always referred to when I say universe (protip: do not discuss this subject with normies)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 18 Dec 2021 05:56:09 No.13977070 Report

Quoted By:

>>13975832
is not compatible with the second law of thermodynamics

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches