>>13972595INTP(A), while the description of INTP was very accurate for me my actual result was INTJ.
I think the Myers Briggs has something they accidentally got correct, but its not refined enough to be reliable or accurate enough for common use, it provides a nice basis for understanding personalities, but its too flawed, i cant recomment using it or atleast you should not think of it as any sort of authority or science.
Sure it can be a good tool to explore different kinds of personalities and gain something to use for self reflection, but its annoyingly incomplete and its way too easy for people to commit all sorts of fallacies when reading into this too much, i wish someone made a better version of it.
