>>13965259Yeah... That kinda works. I say that in a sense of it does help in recognizing good information but it is quite vague. How would you do it?
>>13966565Gatekept? You mean the most "truthful" information is being kept hidden. If so, I say nah. I don't really believe that there is this malevolent person or a big brother watching our every step.
>>13966181Kinda tough if you are already on it. The internet is a hell of a drug. I think more addictive than any physical substance. At least for me.
>>13966655Well I get that but not all information is in like a blog post or youtube video has some rating system. Most of the time if you want to get into the nitty-gritty of things It would require you to read and understand it. My question just wants to know how do I get to go through them all and not waste my time looking at garbage stuff.
>>13966703This is a thread about how to avoid junk information not create them. How is this relevant? Unless you're trying to be funny.
>>13966737Yeah, like to my other replies. It gets tedious, especially when the lingo is either culture specific or really technical that requires a lot of foundational knowledge to understand the topic.
