Dude because of time relativity it's absurd to date the universe in terms of "years old" because like years implies the rate/speed/intensity at which movement occurs here, like you can mao Jupiters movements in regard to years. But someone going near the speed of light experiences time wayyyy slower so like, to them the experiential year would could be like an hour(earth time). And you can't map it to the physical year (earth rotations) either. So the whole notion is totally absurd.

Like if we experienced equivalent ratios of flow at higher intensity, fast things would feel same as at this rate, as long as ratios corresponded cause then the chemical synthesis would occur at similarly fast rate within the mind, and similarly with slower rates. So earth created closer to dawn of universe would have the exact same estimations of how near it is to the origin of the universe if judging by degrees like "years" rooted in the experiential conception of time, or the plotting of planetary movements, because of matter density which speeds up rate of change/time because of force of gravity.