>>13966348Saying
>>13964058>If you are stationary with respect to the CMBR you will see if be the same frequency in all directions.Is not the same as saying "well actually you will see similar bands of frequencies". And no, you don't get to throw your fucking hands up and whine and complain that people in this thread are getting hung up on the details of your argument when you're arguing is that core principles of physics are wrong.
I'll refer you back to my point back in
>>13963627. Every observer has a unique observable CMBR and therefore what they define as their "preferred frame" is going to differ. The CMBR is not an absolute rest frame because it is determined locally, not globally. The closest you could get to using the CMBR to determine some kind of absolute frame would be if you could somehow simultaneously measure the CMBR frames at multiple, very, *very* distant locations and determine where they converge. Of course, there's no guarantee that they would converge and there's no way of making such a measurement that we know of, so it's a bit of a moot point.
