>>13960757I don't know why simply distracting has to have such a fancy fallacy, but no; I won't accuse you of anything but maybe misunderstanding.
Bad management makes the problems it then has to solve. If you have a management system that doesn't reward what is creating problems, then the problems become more costly to create. All I was pointing out was that centralization as a management strategy -- whether along the lines of people, culture, or dependent products -- creates the problem of rewarding the centralization, not what is managed. Further technology to centralize only further rewards more centralization.
The brilliance of a market system is that consumption informs production. Yet in capitalism, the creation of centralized products worldwide is rewarded because it creates the scarcity that keeps the bookkeeping of consumption -- the price -- high. Instead of being able to then make new products or change the benefits, the concurrent benefits of the other products makes that impossible and so consumption doesn’t inform production, production informs consumption.
This stresses the environment. Instead of local foods and local balance with local environments, global products change local production to global products that the environment is ill equipped to provide. Think of how the Amazon rainforest can’t really support cattle, yet the global demand for beef makes the bookkeeping system reward that, instead of local plants that could equally support existence.
Distractions about moral issues are only using the same deception that the capitalist use to maintain their myth.
