>>13957501Most simply don't care and mind their own work alone.
Some scientists however, and some of these are popular in the media, use scientific findings to extrapolate towards philosophical claims, usually by means of unsound arguments. When this occurs, most philosophers will ignore it, but some will write critical articles about it, which will enrage the already mentioned scientists (scientist/influence/tv.personality)
The second reason: philosophers have a history of being critical towards every discipline, this we've seen since the ancient greeks. Most people will be rather upset when an outsider criticises the methodology of their work, even the arguments are often right.
>>13958050>They have no original thoughts, At university, hardly anyone has original thoughts. It is expected of people who desire to do any reserach in philosophy to be able to regurgitate what other people wrote, this is, the main works until present, before going to do their own research.
But I do agree in this: philosophy education is lacking in diversity. The current state of philosophical studies in universty is mostly directed at a study of its own history.
