>>13954489>>13954491It's not that hard to think of these things. It should come pretty automatically if you start by thinking that suffering is bad.
Maybe you could say that you've been brainwashed into thinking that suffering is bad, or that all humans have human rights (not just yourself) but you can't say it's a midwith thing to think these things.
Actually, if you haven't thought of these things your own intelligence is probably far below midwit.
>>13954504I'm proud to be a midwit.
You could think of it as being in the middle of function.
1. literal retards
2. regular people incapable of thought
3. midwits
4. geniuses
possibly something between 3 and 4. maybe smart people - geniuses
And if you're only looking at it in the context of logical thought, then 100 IQ people are closer to literal retards in that they are incapable of thought. Midwits are in the middle, able to use simple logic but don't much more than that, and smart people are capable of complex thought.
