>>13952702different guy, but laziness is the result of intelligent people is.
Sure it isn't the intention and is redeemed by some sort of stoic individual way, but it's still an indirect result of someone's actions.
This is where you would be wondering why I'm basically restating you, and it's because you are assuming the image of intelligent actors then talking down to this anon. The same actors who intentially allowed those like him to be ignorant, lazy, and enjoy it.
I can't tell you what to do with this concept but I'm a tad confused by this hypocritical thought process. If you don't expect convenience to improve individual merit why do you insist upon it?
