>>13952343Any subspecies of humanity subdivision that'd try to make the whole of Africa's population, or its majority, to be consistent would need to make an "African" and a "Non-African" distinction. If you tried to add anything else, then Africa would have dozens of human subspecies, none of them neatly contained in any border, and the USA alone would involve more subspecies that you can reasonably count.
And for what purpose, exactly? What do you gain from creating dozens of human subspecies and giving them an actual name, when you can just look at the specific genes that you need to check?
Human beings aren't dogs, they weren't bred for a specific job, and any attempts to give actual meaning to """human biodiversity""" is foolhardy at best, and prone to cause more trouble than it's worth at best.
Tl;dr: it's true in such a way that it's utterly meaningless.
