>>13950276>The fact that you actually find kinda-maybe-suggestive messages on literal toddler's underwear might be either projection or busybody syndrome. Either way, given it's the age where being nude in public can be sorta acceptable, unless you miniaturize hooker/gigolo clothing it's hard to manage to sexualize toddlers.It's funny, because reading all of this, it's pretty clear that you're a centre-left neoliberal normie, and I can guarantee you would not have the same opinions about people projecting racist motives onto popular culture, public institutions, art, music, etc. For example, I'm actually probably more of a leftist than you (and I'm also a 'minority'), but I have noticed many centrist neoliberals like yourself, unironically claim that people like Donald Trump or boomer-tier lolbertarian groups that wave around the gadston flag are literal "white nationalists", despite almost no political organizations in the US today identifying as "White nationalist". In other words, it's okay for centrist neoliberals like yourself to describe Donald Trump or his supporters as a "white nationalist", and to project genocidal and racist ideologies onto normie-tier conservatives, and you do so without evidence, but if people, in apurely apolitical context, express skepticism of a multinational corporation's motives, or suggest that a company might in some capacity be exploiting or manipulating either it's workers or the general public, then you view that as a form of "projection". Basically, anyone who criticizes corporate america, the mainstream media, or the political establishment, or even expresses skepticism concerning the motives of these bodies is just a crazy conspiracy theorist engaging in "projection".
Anyway, I know neoliberal centrists are incapable of engaging in good-faith debate, which is why the generally resort to methods of censorship. For that reason, I don't expect any genuine response to my post, but hopefully I give you something to consider.
