>>13951393Following your line of logic there, given the following conditions
51% are vaccinated (more people vaccinated than unvaccinated)
99% sick are vaccinated (more sick who are vaccinated)
You would think the above is logical for a vaccine? Probably not which highlights your bias like a sore thumb.
So far the data is
59% fully vaccinated (more people vaccinated than unvaccinated)
79% sick are vaccinated (more suck who are vaccinated)
At what ratio do you draw the line and just admit you have your head up your ass?
100% and 100% is the only possible combination that would fit your biased pseudo logic.
Besides, you'd still agree with your own logic counterpoint:
"More vaccinations means less covid cases in the vaccinated" (which is what historical data shows) because guess what most fat obese conservatives won't get the vaccine.
You aren't even wrong because you are low information.
Fact is, omicron is weak. Its being brought into the US by vaccinated international travelers (mostly democrats obviously. Rednecks don't leave their shitty backwoods cities).
It's the vaccinated assholes bringing it in obviously when you see 79% of cases in the vaccinated. The data was all collected in airports for crying out loud.
So if it ever does become "most omicron cases are in the unvaccinated" then you now know who to thank.
