>>13946421Langan is a pseud. Savant is a pseud.
>Jung>Sidis>Freud>PetersonAll of them complete pseuds. They're not stupid but not actually geniuses, midwits at best.
>Kastrup>Woods>TarantinoNot geniuses either. Why are actors and directors being posted on /sci/? It's a midwit tier profession, doesn't require any intellectual heavy lifting whatsoever.
>Shakespeare>Dosteoevksy>the restDon't post novelists and writers either. Not geniuses.
If you want to make a point, post fields medalists and nobel prize winners. Actual, real geniuses who have provably contributed to science/math in useful ways. You only have witten on there because he doesn't contradict your point. See Perelman? He had a normal sized head, there are seriously a thousand other high profile scientists/mathematicians who contradict your point.
