>>13943569In my experience, beam analysis isn't actually understood by teachers/lecturers beyond being a systematic thing, none of them really explain what's going only that you do it and it works.
>>13943577This guy is right, maybe not as aggressive but reading a book would give you a better idea at your own pace and isn't letter garbage on scrap paper. They pretty much copy the books as well so if you can find their reading list (hint: has their exact content), you should be good.
