>>13943346>Tee hee science is complicated so every time we omit something it's justifiedNot even remotely what it says in the video
>Pop-sci was a mistakeIt was not, the why is also explained in the video (to which you didnt even link btw)
>Where can I watch decent channels covering science without manipulating viewers?There is none. Best you can do is become an expert in the subject yourself, but even then you will be somewhat biased/unknowledgeable because currently existing fields or research (even subfields of subfields of subfields) are so large and complex that there is no hope learning/knowing everything.
Long story short, dont worry about not being an expert, trust the experts and just enjoy the educational/mind broadening experience.
>inb4 "trust the experts ROTFL"yes, experts can and sometimes are biased, can and sometimes are wrong, and the system is imperfect, but this system is also the best thing we could come up with so far and is more or less working. If you have a good solution/suggestion, share it, otherwise stop LARPing as an expert and STFU
