>>13940137I just can't believe how unhelpful the paper was. The research itself was solid and of forest regeneration, but there wasn't any substance. When I think of Nature, I think of studies I can learn important lessons from. Generalizable results. Broad implications. I couldn't take away anything from it because they didn't give any context for the work they did. All I could say was "yep, these scientists did this study. I have no idea what this means for a different study area in a different part of the world."
And to think people pay thousands of dollars for the prestige. Utter garbage.
