>>13945152You’re replying to a literal schizophrenic who, though they might have been somewhat smart at some point, is pretty much brain damaged. It’s a sad story but you must be some newfag if you didn’t recognise him
>using namecalling as an argument because it can't control it's emotionsBut you probably are that, a bluecollar worker, so I don’t see anything wrong with pointing it out. The absolute state of your spelling pretty much cements it. You’re also talking out of your ass and discrediting advancements that you know absolutely nothing about. Every low IQ nigger these days seem to be screaming about muh stagnation
