>>13923278>How does one reconcile the insights of Kant with Einstein?By not presuming Kant was right just because you like his arguments, or rejecting anyone else's thoughts simply because they disagree with Kant.
What did Kant prove? Absolutely nothing.
>>13923376Let's just set aside for a moment that you can literally observe relativistic time frames between not just satellites and Earth, so absolutely zero bitching or moaning about ITS NOT POSSIBLE goes right out the window. Let's just look at part of this dude's conclusion:
>But this is not the only reason why Einstein's concept of space-time must be wrong>Such a conclusion relegates all human activity to simply being autonomatonsNot only does space-time not remotely imply determinism, this is a bullshit, childish argument that effectively boils down to, "The idea of not having free will scares me so bad I can't even imagine it." I am not a determinist and yet I can still see the outlandishly childish fear this man is possessed by to make such a vapid, pointless conclusion. If you fear truth because it might mean you're not the master of the universe, you're not a scientist - you're a cultist.
This guy hasn't disproven shit, and you're an idiot for believing this crap.
>>13923356Idealistis are not fundamentally different than schizophrenics, which is why you get ignored. Idealism is to useful thought what miasma theory of disease was to useful medicine - you accidentally got some results and have presumed superiority, despite having been thoroughly disproven numerous times.
No one cares about your head games when I can observe things directly.
>B-B-BUT YOU ARENT LISTEN TO THIS 250-YEARS-DEAD GERMAN TELL YOU THAT YOU CANTBlow it out your ass. Idealism is the woman with BPD of the truth-seeking world, operating in bad faith and delusions to gaslight all other people into participating in their cult. Go away, and let your bullshit die 200+ years ago like it should have.
