>>13917002Past performance doesn't prove anything about future performance. It's impossible to consistently beat the market with any active investment strategy without insider information. Meta-analyses of studies of actively managed funds prove that on average, they underperform compared to passively managed funds, and that any basket of actively managed funds selected on the basis of outsized performance in one period is not statistically likely to outperform passively managed funds in a future period. Despite that, out of the millions of funds out there, you can always cherrypick one that looks like this within any given timeframe.
So no, I wouldn't invest in this, and if you think any of the information in the image should even inform an investment decision in the first place, you should read more.
