/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13916005

202KiB, 680x1221, HD101065.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Przybylski's Star

Anonymous Thu 02 Dec 20:35:22 2021 No.13916005 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13916187 >>13917200 >>13917227 >>13917251 >>13918244 >>13918250 >>13920205 >>13924166 >>13925459 >>13925530 >>13926461

>hardly any iron
>far more lanthanides than normal
>short half-life actinides like promethium, protactinium and einsteinium
How is this star producing ultra-heavy radioactive elements?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 02 Dec 2021 21:22:40 No.13916187 Report

Quoted By:

>>13916005
through capitalism

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 01:40:04 No.13917200 Report

Quoted By: >>13917307 >>13933486

>>13916005
It's a factory made by ayys.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 01:57:21 No.13917227 Report

Quoted By:

>>13916005
I would say the obvious answer; Its a signal.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 02:14:10 No.13917251 Report

Quoted By:

>>13916005
>promethium
>actinide

It's a lanthanide...

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO deathMuppet.gif, 3MiB, 360x270

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 02:44:54 No.13917307 Report

Quoted By:

>>13917200
go on..
>/x this shit nigger
>I mean, fuck /sci it's not like it's the smart board or anything

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 10:32:34 No.13918244 Report

Quoted By: >>13930886 >>13933486

>>13916005
nearby civ dumping nuclear waste?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 10:34:42 No.13918250 Report

Quoted By:

>>13916005
it has a planet with a Space Jew problem and the star figured out what to do about it.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Mendelev_s_Nightmare.png, 284KiB, 2281x952

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 20:22:43 No.13920205 Report

Quoted By: >>13920342 >>13921727

>>13916005
This is my favorite star because there is spectroscopic evidence of super transitional elements. Pic relate.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 03 Dec 2021 21:00:54 No.13920342 Report

Quoted By:

>>13920205
Bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 04:25:37 No.13921727 Report

Quoted By: >>13924000

>>13920205
Supermetals? For real? Which island of stability?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 19:55:26 No.13924000 Report

Quoted By:

>>13921727
Not that anon, but one of the theories put forward is that the unusual elements are decay products of superheavies. I'm not aware of any actual evidence for that though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 20:28:15 No.13924166 Report

Quoted By: >>13924353

>>13916005
stars do not use the atomic model. They are created from a z pinch in a Birkeland current. This is why stars constantly make no sense to mainstream science.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO img20.gif, 28KiB, 755x623

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 21:09:27 No.13924353 Report

Quoted By: >>13924377

>>13924166
Why don't you show us the predicted abundances from this z pinch model to compare with the data? Or perhaps even create a synthetic spectrum?
You can't because there is no model. EU doesn't make any quantitive predictions so it's never proven wrong. You just use it as a "god of the gaps". EU is not science.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1635551598414.gif, 3MiB, 450x326

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 21:15:25 No.13924377 Report

Quoted By: >>13924426

>>13924353
>EU makes no quantitative predictions

lol cope tranny

EU has literally been owning NASA on EVERY single it has sent out. You now have to explain why nasa "Scientists" are always baffled and EU is like "yup we said this probe would find this and then it di." Nasa is like "noooooo it has to work with what Einstein said, even though Einstein admitted his shit was wrong in the end"

kill yourself

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 21:30:22 No.13924426 Report

Quoted By:

>>13924377
You seem to struggle with English, so let me simplify. If EU really predicted this then post the table of abundances. Thanks.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1638653815311.jpg, 19KiB, 389x292

Anonymous Sat 04 Dec 2021 21:36:58 No.13924452 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 03:25:14 No.13925459 Report

Quoted By: >>13925606

>>13916005
Hope I'm not hijacking this thread, but I didn't want to create a whole thread for a question that should be pretty simple/short to answer. I'm a noob to a lot of space science/theory and while I do understand red-shift and how it leads to a theory of universal expansion what I want to know is if there are any observations that support stars becoming more distant. So not red-shift, but measurements of stars that gradually have become dimmer over time as they move further away. Is this something that has been verified, or will it take better sensors/more time to see a measurable difference?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 03:51:31 No.13925530 Report

Quoted By:

>>13916005
likely decay products of isotopes around the island of stability. pryzbyslski's star is probably a stellar body that formed from the supernovae of several previously exploded small, unstable stars in orbit of each other.

or it's aliens idk

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 04:09:46 No.13925606 Report

Quoted By: >>13925671

>>13925459
Two stars of the same mass will have different apparent brightness if they're not the same distance from the earth. Stars moving away from the earth will get dimmer as irradiance falls off over square of distance, but this is not something that's going to be easily noticeable as its only that most distant galaxies that are moving away very quickly and we're still seeing their light from billions of years ago.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 04:36:35 No.13925671 Report

Quoted By: >>13925686

>>13925606
So that's a no? Even over the last 100 years of telescopes advancing in power there are no stars that have observably diminished due to the effect of universal expansion?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 04:39:44 No.13925686 Report

Quoted By: >>13925732

>>13925671
It's really small effect. The only stars receding from us at a very fast pace are already billions of light years away. Whatever distance they've covered in the past century is significant compared to how far away they already were.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 04:53:09 No.13925732 Report

Quoted By:

>>13925686
Alright fair enough, thanks for your time sir.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 09:37:06 No.13926461 Report

Quoted By: >>13927206 >>13928722 >>13930886 >>13933486

>>13916005
Techno signature from an advanced civilisation, they are either dumping nuclear waste into the star to get rid of it or they’ve done it on purpose so we can detect that they exist

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 16:11:02 No.13927206 Report

Quoted By:

>>13926461
Why would an advanced civilisation have large quantities of nuclear waste in the first place? Surely they would be far beyond using fission power

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 05 Dec 2021 23:56:19 No.13928722 Report

Quoted By:

>>13926461
That would be a truly insane amount of nuclear waste, to the point that it would be a similar mystery as to where they got the fuel from.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 06 Dec 2021 14:12:10 No.13930886 Report

Quoted By: >>13931137

>>13926461
>>13918244
An advanced civilization big enough to dump that much waste into a star also has enough energy to transmute it into something useful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 06 Dec 2021 15:30:02 No.13931137 Report

Quoted By: >>13931849 >>13932428

>>13930886
just because they can doesn't mean it's economical
Given the mass of the star, are there eny estimates on how many tons of this stuff are in the star's surface?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 06 Dec 2021 19:04:44 No.13931849 Report

Quoted By:

>>13931137
There are abundances listed in table 6 here: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/317/2/299/1005394#92474362
Search me for what that actually means in terms of mass.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 06 Dec 2021 22:09:05 No.13932428 Report

Quoted By:

>>13931137
You are long beyond economics if you dump planetary masses of valuable materials into stars for no good reason.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 07 Dec 2021 05:21:03 No.13933486 Report

Quoted By:

>>13917200
>>13918244
>>13926461
>something comes up that contradicts standard theory
>"it must be aliens/dark matter!"
Every time.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches