>>13915185You're critiquing the other anon for having no idea what they're trying to refute, despite you not defining what you yourself are talking about, and then concluding that you remain unrefuted.
You think people can't tell what you're doing? You don't have a solid position so you're hiding behind being opaque and not speaking clearly, then when someone calls you out on it you reply by saying they are lacking in something, despite all of this being you not engaging in good faith.
