>>13913026observed hubble expansion explains galactic rotation curves without needing to invoke dark matter. but instead of figuring out what predicted galactic rotations curves should look like factoring factor for observed hubble expansion, they just ignore it. the math is too hard for them, mechanics becomes a mess if you have to multiply by hr every time you divide by r squared.
some persian autist figured this all out 15 years ago and published it somewhere respectable and in english enough that i saw it, but everyone else ignored it.
imagine the embarrassment of all the dark matter experts when it turns out they've been chasing phantoms since the 1970s. thats too much for a bunch of know-it-all astronerds to take
