>>13909473I see
I guess it all depends where that point is
because it would never be "pure CO2" for example
and it seems disingenuous to say increased CO2 does nothing, or that there are no upsides to an increase in CO2, at least up to that "point"
also, another theory is that it's a good thing we thickened our atmosphere with the stored CO2. Life was flourishing in the carboniferous period, and less so after the atmosphere was trapped underground. We don't want to end up like Mars, who lost their atmosphere. Better too thick than too thin.
>>13909845This sounds like bullshit to me anon. If you remove all the CO2 from lower levels, then upper levels will diffuse to fill it. You can still affect the CO2 level in the upper atmosphere from ground level.
