>>13903868>I suppose a better question, at least one that you will probably have better luck answering right now, is why baldness is seen as a negative trait by humans when they are already relatively very bald compared to other mammalsIt seems like everything that sets humans apart from other mammals is considered sexually unattractive, and the more animalistic you are, the more sexually attractive.
We're small, relatively weak for mammals, yet being excessively strong and muscular is considered very attractive, despite millions of years of evolution making us the size we are to balance energy efficiency and practicality.
Being high testosterone and having a large penis is also considered very attractive despite human males being unaggressive and having small dicks compared to other mammals like horses.
Women bending over and fucking in doggy style is considered a massive turn on despite humans being bipedal creatures .
It seems every step in our evolution is contrary to our own sexual nature. Shouldn't us women be turned on by smaller men with great dexterity and high intelligence who are good with tools? Why do the most attractive features in men resemble that of monkeys?
