>>13900212To the best of my knowledge, due to the Lorentz factor it is not possible for anything with a meaningful amount of mass to travel faster than light. First, time is a kind of coordinate that all framed of reference have in non-Euclidean spacetime. Light behaves like waves and particles and it can exchange energy with matter. But then there is the wave theory of matter which is where things fall apart because you end up in quantum mechanics. So, is matter a wave or a particle, and in either state can it “travel” faster than light in coordinate spacetime? Usually we say that our scale is “too small” on the quantum level for the curvature of non-Euclidean space to apply. Hence objects can move in geometrically ideal configurations. But what if space itself is geometrically ideal? As in, space (or spacetime) is comprised of Platonic solids, organized such that time is slowing, like entropy, arbitrarily close to zero, but we simply cannot notice? Well the irony is that we would land back in relativity: if something is moving near the speed of light, it experiences time “more slowly” than objects moving not near the speed of light. They are traversing the spacetime continuum. Now, let’s say someone takes a rocket trip from Earth to Pluto and back at light speed. I dont feel like doing the calculation but more time would pass for people on Earth than for the person in the rocket.
1/2
