>>13900173No I use my gut rection to cautiously approach certain claiments, I don't rely on my gut when it comes to data analysis.
There's nothing inherently wrong with approaching a broad swathe of topics to try and get a perspective on the various interelated fields, but on some of them I dig into the actual research to try and build my own understanding of the topic because I often find that other humans lie too much by omission or simply forgetting. I've only been dipping into conspiracies for a couple of years.
Is my English not clear enough for people to understand my words or something they keep misunderstanding me?
but as a counter argument to your counter argument is what you were taught in school reliable? So much of what I was taught in school history class has turned out to be completely differnt to the rerality does this apply to other fields like the sciences? Is our foundation of logic really as reliable as were think it was? outside of maths it's very difficult to know.
Regarding your topic switching argument I do have key areas of focus but I explore otehr areas more infrequently. I can't say it's a perfect argument but slowly building understanding in different fields allows me to see more deeply into others.
