>>13900886>>13900957It is standard practice to grant a nobel to the surviving members of a team that has made a significant discovery, regardless of individual contributions, and thus she deserved the nobel at the very minimum as she assisted her husband. The question one might ask is: how much was her contribution, really, especially vs "merely" continuing her husband's work?
Regardless of the answer, I think the evidence is clear that she was a serious scientist, quite unlike, say, ada or turing.
