>>13896214How do you explain the anomalous rotation of galaxies if not for dark matter? Do you think the current understanding of gravity is wrong? What makes you think that's a more likely explanation than the existence of another particle?
If "dark matter" is just gravity behaving in an unexpected way, then how come we can map its distribution by observing gravitational lensing of objects behind the target galaxy and also observe that these "heavy non-interacting areas" behave as expected when galaxies slam into each other?
In the bullet cluster, picrel, you can see that when two galactic clusters slammed together, the dark matter of each cluster (blue) kept on flying with extra momentum in both directions compared to the gas (pink) which due to its charge and physical touching lost some speed. If "dark matter" were a property of the gravity emanating from the galaxies' visible mass particles, you wouldn't be able to separate it from those particles by accelerating them. Unless you think gravity works like bugs bunny's shadow.
Inb4 cope about the images being fabricated, you having forgotten to dilate, etc
