Because there are four possible variants at play:
A) I am just a human typing this convincing another human(you) that (I) do exist
B) I am just a human(I) typing this convincing some machine generated text(you) that I exist
C) I am just machine text trying to convince (you), a human, I exist.
D) Both You and I are machine text convincing each other one is real.
And then there's E) I am everything and you as you are, are just a manifestation of me.
Then F is vice versa.... well, whatever. Oocams razor.
But that doesn't explain why there's something instead of nothing....nothing exists is definitely a simpler explanation than everything exists by design....or is that true?
Fuck my brain hurts. I guess you're right anon, I can't prove to you I exist.
#
this4chanpostwasrandomlygeneratedbyAIsoftware.io query=snarkiness
