>>13893117Problems with this abstract:
Solo Author
Known Scam Artist who happens to have a medical degree
Citations consist of the farts coming out of his butthole
There is NO WAY IN HELL he conducted these tests and survey follow-ups by himself. Yet, he is the only author of the paper?
That does not add up, at all.
There are known risks of myocarditis and pericarditis in relation to the mRNA Covid preventive treatments. (I personally refuse to call that garbage a vaccine, because the traditional definition of vaccine does not allow for breakthrough case counts at pandemic thresholds.)
However, those risks are addressed in a different, much more responsible study.
VAERS takes those reports seriously, and additional data and findings in regards to the heart risks of the mRNA based Covid preventive treatments are being gathered for study and publication.
At this time, the consensus is that for the majority of patients, the risk of Covid-19's damage to the body vs the risk of the mRNA based Covid-19 preventive treatments, is still favorable to receiving the preventive treatments.
I am not anti-vax. I am not pro emergency preventive treatment mandate.
These are the viewpoints of someone in the middle.
We should not mandate these treatments at 100% rate, it is irresponsible to science, and therefore society as well.
If 100% of individuals are vaccinated, then who are our control patients?
We can not responsibly continue to investigate the potential harm of these treatments, if we force them on everyone and nullify any option for having a proper control group in any studies.
Please and thank you.
