>>13894669>What's wrong about the first sentence?His implication is wrong. He's implying that the governments of the world are constantly moving the goalposts. Is there a legal definition of "fully vaccinated"? Can you go to jail for not being fully vaccinated? Are you aware that a vast majority of vaccination rules are being carried out by corporations and independent agencies, not the government?
Also, did he bring this point up any other year before this in regard to any other vaccine? What about the yearly flu shot? We will LITERALLY never be fully vaccinated against the flu shot because a new one is made every year. How come almost nobody was crying about that? That's what's untrue about not only the first statement but all of the others. It's a targeted rant that, when expanded to any other aspect of society, falls apart. The joke is that the people who take it seriously are not very intelligent.
>"There's no end in sight"Are you actually 5 years old? Have you never experienced life before or are you just incapable of thought past a couple years? Have you also not just considered that if a fuckload of unvaccinated people hadn't gone to places like FL and grouped up in gatherings of tens of thousands of people for a year and a half now, the virus would not spread as much? That's what I mean--people like you just say bullshit hot takes like "no end in sight" without giving thought to anything whatsoever.
